Introduction

 

Cereal cyst nematodes (CCNs) are the most widely distributed parasites of cereals and grasses, which have caused substantial economic losses to wheat production (Smiley and Nicol 2009). In China, CCNs are known to be distributed across 16 provinces (Chen et al. 1991; Peng et al. 2012). Among the CCNs, Heterodera avenae and H. filipjevi negatively impact the wheat production, resulting in significant reductions of 15–80% in the yield annually (Li et al. 2010).

Most CCNs are able to complete only one generation of their life cycle during each crop season. The J2s (infective second-stage juveniles) penetrate the epidermal and cortical cells using their robust stylet, following which they migrate intracellularly toward the vascular stele (Jung and Wyss 1999). After the “migration period”, the nematodes select an initial syncytium cell (ISC) and stay motionless for approximately eight hours. When this stage, referred to as the “feeding-preparation period”, is completed, it is followed by the “feeding site period” which begins at approximately 18 h post-inoculation (hpi). When the nematodes enter into the ISC, they release cell-wall modifying proteins from their esophageal glands, inducing the formation of enlarged feeding cells. Thereafter, the nematodes feed on the water- and nutrient-conductive tissues in the host root, marking the completion of their life cycle (Sobczak and Golinowski 2009).

The infection of wheat roots with CCN leads to impairments in the physiological aspects and growth of the infected host plants. Several histological changes such as the formation of the syncytium, dissolution of surrounding cell walls, enlargement of nucleoli, accumulation of endoplasmic reticulum, deposition of callose, increase in the number of vacuoles, and appearance of nematode secretions near the stylet during the period between 18 hpi and 4 dpi have been reported (Mahalingam and Skorupska 1996). The CCN infection elicits the response of the host defense system, along with tremendous alterations in the gene expression in wheat cells. Signaling within both the nematode and the plant is necessary for the formation and maintenance of the syncytium (Davis et al. 2008; Gheysen and Mitchum 2009). Identification of active, differentially-expressed genes might provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of interaction between nematode and plant, and propose technologies for crop protection (Williamson and Kumar 2006; Klink and Matthews 2009). GeneChip microarray technology serves as a useful platform for studying alterations in gene expression during the process of nematode infection. A study was conducted on soybean–SCN (soybean cyst nematode) interaction using soybean array, focusing on the sensitive response of soybean to the SCN infection (Puthoff et al. 2003; Ithal et al. 2007a). Other related studies focused on SCN infection in susceptible and resistant varieties (Klink et al. 2007b; Mazarei et al. 2011). In the present study, customized Agilent 4 × 44 K wheat whole-genome oligo microarray, containing 43,803 probe sets and spanning over 42,000 transcripts, was utilized for investigating early gene expression in the wheat roots infected with H. filipjevi. The present research would assist in understanding the wheat–CCN interaction during the onset of the syncytium establishment.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Experimental materials

 

An H. filipjevi-susceptible wheat cultivar Chinese Spring was used as a host in the present study (Zhang et al. 2012). The seeds from the host plant were surface-disinfected by soaking in 95% ethanol for 3 min, followed by further treatment with 10% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min in a laminar flow hood using sterile culture techniques. Seedlings of wheat were grown in sterile sand in flats (20 × 20 × 10 cm3) in a growth chamber for one week, following which they were pulled out softly from the sterile sand, rinsed with sterile water, and dried using bibulous paper.

The cysts of H. filipjevi (pathotype Hfc-1) were obtained from Xuchang, Henan province, China (34.04°N, 113.74°E) (Li et al. 2010).

 

Treatments

 

Hatching of the cysts was achieved by following the method described ahead. The full cysts with bright color were separated, sterilized using 0.5% NaClO for 10 min, and washed several times with sterile water. The selected cysts were added into tubes containing 50 mL sterile water and stored at 4°C in a refrigerator for two months to retain moisture. Subsequently, the cysts were incubated at 15°C in an artificial climate incubator.

In order to prepare the pi-J2s (pre-infective second-stage juvenile nematodes), the hatched cysts inside the tubes were poured on a 250-µm mesh cloth and washed with sterile water. The washed pi-J2s were carefully harvested and placed into a clean flask, followed by the addition of sterile water until the volume of 100 mL was reached. After proper mixing, 100 µL of the sterile water containing pi-J2s were pipetted into a hemacytometer to evaluate the exact number of pi-J2s using a microscope. Ten repeats were averaged for the calculation of the concentration of J2s in the suspension. Finally, the J2s were diluted to a final concentration of 4000 individuals mL–1.

Seedlings were placed on moistened filter paper placed inside plastic trays. The inoculum (nematode suspension) was added directly to the roots, at a final concentration of 1000 J2s/root. The blank control (mock-inoculated) was inoculated with the same amount of sterile water. The roots were then covered with a moistened sheet of germinating paper and placed in a plastic tray (size: 45 × 50 × 20 cm3) with 1 cm water level at the bottom for humidity. The tray was then covered with a translucent plastic film and was maintained under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. Using the knowledge from previous experiments, the inoculated wheat roots were grown for 24 hpi only. The roots of the inoculated and mock-inoculated were washed; one inoculated seedling root–as a sample, and four samples were prepared as technical replicas using the same method. Four control samples were prepared using the same method. Finally, the root tissues were frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

 

Root penetration assay

 

The inoculated roots were harvested at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-inoculation (hpi), followed by soaking in 1.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 min, and then washing with tap water to remove the excess sodium hypochlorite. The roots were stained using 1 mL of 3.5% acid fuchsin (Bybd et al. 1983). The solution was heated until boiling, followed by cooling to room temperature and then rinsing with tap water to remove the excess stain. The stained roots were used to prepare slide specimens, which were then observed under a microscope. Ten seedlings were selected at each sampling time point, and for each of these seedlings, 3 root tips were selected randomly, followed by counting the number of J2s in the root tissue. In order to analyze the number of J2s in the root tissue, one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni multiple comparison test were performed using S.P.S.S. 20.0 software.

 

RNA extraction and agilent GeneChip hybridization

 

The time points selected for the collection of the materials were all within the period between the infusion of nematode in wheat and the formation of syncytium cells. Therefore, rather than the syncytium cells, the inoculated roots and the mock-inoculated roots were collected as the experimental materials. Total RNA was extracted from the experimental group and the control group using the Trizol reagent in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were measured using a spectrophotometer, and the RNA Integrity Number (RIN) was verified using Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent).

Probes were prepared using Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit-plus for One-color (Agilent). An aliquot of two micrograms of total RNA from each sample was converted into complementary RNA labeled with fluorophore Cyanine 3-CTP (CY3c). The labeled cRNAs were further purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and RNase-Free DNase Set (QIAGEN, GmBH, Germany). The probes were evaluated for yield, concentration, amplification efficiency, and abundance of CY3c, using Nanodrop ND–1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) at A260 and A550.

The Agilent 4 × 44 K wheat whole-genome oligo microarray, with 43,803 probe sets and spanning over 42,000 transcripts (design ID: 022297), was constructed on the basis of the wheat transcriptome information available in WormBase, RefSeq, Unigene, and TIGR databases. A total of eight microarrays of single dye were considered for each sample following the manufacturer's instructions (Agilent Technologies One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis). In brief, each slide was hybridized with 1.65 µg Cy3-labeled cRNA, in a hybridizing oven at 65°C and 10 rpm, using a gene expression hybridization Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, C.A., U.S.). After 17 h of hybridization, the slides were washed with gene expression Buffer Kit (Agilent) in a staining dish (Thermo Shandon, Waltham, MA, USA).

 

Data analysis and gene annotation

 

Agilent chip scanner G2565CA was used with default settings for hybridized slides scanning at 550 nm. The image processing program of the feature extraction software 10.7 (Agilent) was utilized to process the scanned .tiff files and generate the standard data for statistical analysis. The original data were normalized using the quantile algorithm, followed by the processing of all the samples from the baseline to median using Gene Spring Software 11.0 (Agilent). Detected, undetected, and leaked data were marked as P, A, and M, respectively, and the standardized data were transformed into log2 values (Quackenbush 2002). Coefficients of variations (CVs) were calculated using the signal readings obtained from the ten replicates of the probe spots and were used to determine the stability in the Agilent array system. The detection percentages were also calculated from the number of detected spots (with flags, except A) and the number of total spots. All the CVs were below 10% (range: 4.13−6.19%), while the detection percentages ranged from 70.10 to 76.21%.

The Diffgene programs, including t-test and SAM (significant analysis of microarray) (Tusher et al. 2001) from Shanghai Biochip Co., Ltd. (SBC) analysis system (http://sas.ebioservice.com/, SAS), were used to screen the differentially expressed genes. The program was connected to the R-software (The R Project for Statistical Computing, http://www.r-project.org), the Gene Ontology website (http://www.geneotology.org), NCBI Entrez Gene, KEGG, Biocarta, MINT, among others. The average expression values for different groups were used to calculate the ratio of expression changes between the treated samples and the control samples. The criteria for the identification of the differentially expressed genes induced by the CCN-infection were as follows: (i) differential expression of genes between nematode-infected plants and mock-infected plants was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05); (ii) the fold change (FC) in the expression of inoculated sample and control sample was ≥ 2 (up-regulated) or ≤ 0.5 (down-regulated); and (iii) the flag/call value for each probe site “A” did not occur in either group.

The genes exhibiting a change of greater than 2-fold or less than 0.5-fold in response to the CCN infection were classified according to their logarithmic transformation rate using the hierarchical clustering method (Anderberg 1973). The annotation information was obtained from GenBank. BLASTx search was applied on three databases, which included these genes assigned to the known genes of rice or Arabidopsis–the TIGR rice pseudomolecules database, the KOME peptide sequence database, and the TIGR Arabidopsis annotation database (ATH1). Accession numbers of the wheat mRNA (with certain exceptions such as those for rice) were identified through BLAST search in NCBI. Gene classification based on gene ontology (GO) was performed using the hierarchical clustering program in R software. In the present analysis, the GO terms with an FDR (false discovery rate)-adjusted P-value of ≤ 0.05 were retained.

 

Real-time qRT-PCR verification

 

A total of six differential genes from various functional categories were selected randomly for the validation of the microarray data using real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Gene-specific primers based on the sequences of probe sets in the microarray were designed using Primer Premier 6.0, and the specificity of the primer pairs was verified using the blast program in NCBI (Table 1). The wheat actin gene was used for data normalization. Total RNA samples were treated with DNase to remove residual any traces of genomic DNA before the synthesis of the first strand of cDNA from the Oligo dT primer labeled with SuperScript III RT (Invitrogen). PCR was performed in a 96-well plate inside Bio-Rad iCycler real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using SYBR Green I PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad). The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 s, followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 5 s, 60°C for 25 s, and 72°C for 31 s. In order to evaluate the overall specificity, the non-cDNA template was used as a negative control. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Gene expression was quantified using the relative quantitative method (2−ΔΔCT) and was compared with Table 1: Primer sets used in the qRT-PCR analysis

 

Gene symbol

Probe set

Primer sequence

Product size (bp)

Forward

Reverse

EF368363

A_99_P124345

GTCGTCGGGAGGAAGAAAGG

AGCCGTCGTCGAGGATGT

91

JX679079

A_99_P489907

AGTCGGAGCTACAGCGTGTG

GAGGACGGCTGGTTGTTGTAG

163

DQ013358

A_99_P072835

CCGAGAACAGAGTCCCGAGTT

CCATCCAGCAAGACCAACGA

175

EU082065

A_99_P158407

CGATGATATTCAGGGCACAGC

CCAGCACCAAGGAAGAGGTAAG

108

DQ334410

A_99_P195090

CGGAGTTTATGTAGCTGATATGACTG

CCCTGCCGTTGTTGTGC

139

EF368361

A_99_P148642

CGACTACTCGCTGCTTCCG

CCGCTCGTACATGTTCATCG

64

AB181991

Wheat actin

TCCAATCTATGAGGGATACACGC

GCCAGCAAGGTCCAAACGA

58

 

Figure 1

 

Fig. 1: Micrographs showing progression of H. filipjevi infection in Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring roots that were infected with H. filipjevi (pathotype Hfc-1) and grown for different times. Nematodes in wheat roots were stained with acid fuchsin stain. Wheat roots sections were bleached with sodium hypochlorite. A, at 12 hpi, a small amount of J2s already penetrated the wheat root; B, at 24 hpi, more J2s penetrated wheat root and reached the vascular tissue; C, 48 hpi, almost entirely invaded J2s reached the vascular tissue. N=nematode and R=wheat root

 

internal control. Data from the real-time PCR populations were analyzed through an independent t-test in S.P.S.S. 20.0 using an alpha of 0.05 (Canales et al. 2006).

 

Results

 

Time course of H. filipjevi infection in wheat roots

 

The time course of J2s infection was monitored, and the results are presented in Figs. 1 and 2. At 12 hpi and 24 hpi, J2s penetrated the wheat roots and migrated toward the vascular tissue (Fig. 1A and 1B). Subsequently, the nematodes established infection by selecting a cell as the feeding site. The number of J2s in the root tissue at 48 hpi was significantly higher than that at 12 hpi (Fig. 1C). The number of J2s in the root tissue at 24 hpi exhibited no significant differences from that at 12 hpi and 48 hpi (Fig. 2). Therefore, the 24 hpi time point was selected for subsequent gene profiling analyses, which is also consistent with the time at which the CCN began forming the syncytium.

 

Gene expression profiling

 

The microarray analysis identified 820 transcripts that exhibited differential accumulation in the susceptible cultivar with a fold change ratio of ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5 with a P-value ≤ 0.05; in total, 496 transcripts were up-regulated, while 324 transcripts were down-regulated. In all the transcripts exhibiting differential expression, 336 up-regulated transcripts and 292 down-regulated transcripts exhibited an FC ratio between two and four, 109 up-regulated transcripts, and 32 down-regulated transcripts exhibited an FC ratio between four and eight, and 51 up-regulated transcripts exhibited an FC ratio above eight. When a P-value of 0.01 was used, a total of 595 differentially-expressed transcripts were identified, among which 235 were up-regulated and 205 were down-regulated with an FC ratio between two to four, 84 were up-regulated and 23 down-regulated with an FC ratio between four to eight, and 48 were up-regulated at an FC ratio greater than eight (Fig. 3).

Among a total of 820 differentially-expressed genes that were identified, 317 genes had been annotated, and approximately 86% of these annotated genes were identified as having known or speculative functions. Analysis of the annotated data revealed that greater than 17% of these genes were associated with amino acid/protein metabolism, energy metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and fatty acid, and lipid metabolism. Further, 24% of these were involved in transcription regulation, 12% were involved in translation, 15% were involved in signal

 

Fig. 3: Venn diagrams depicting the numbers of differential transcripts in the Chinese Spring (susceptible) after H. filipjevi infection. A, General numbers of transcripts that displayed differential accumulation at different false discovery rate (FDR) of p values and FC 2 (up-regulated) or FC ≤ 0.5 (down-regulated). = up-regulated and = down-regulated. B, Transcripts that displayed up-regulated or down-regulated accumulation with different FC ratio cutoff at an FDR with a P value of ≤ 0.05. C, Transcripts that displayed up-regulated or down-regulated accumulation with different FC ratio cutoffs at an FDR with a P value of ≤ 0.01

 

Fig. 2: Number of J2 penetrating into roots of H. filipjevi -infected assayed at 12, 24 and 48 hpi. Values are means ±SE. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni multiple comparison test in S.P.S.S. 20.0

 

transduction, and the rest were related to cell structure, stress/defense, and transport (Fig. 4). In order to explore the potential pathogenic mechanisms and resistance resources, the focus of the present study was maintained on the functional classifications related to cell structure, stress/defense, transcription factors, signal transduction, and metabolism.

 

Major functional categories of response genes in wheat roots

 

Cell wall, defense, and stress response-related genes: Cell wall strengthening and development are generally viewed as a part of early defense response. Genes related to the cell wall, such as the cellulose synthetase (CESA) gene, play a key role in the defense response to nematode infection. In the microarray analysis conducted in the present study, nine cell wall-related genes exhibited significant changes. Among these genes, glycosyl hydrolase family 5 (JV987084), and glucuronosyltransferase (JV945131), which are involved in the synthesis of glucuronoxylan hemicellulose in secondary cell walls, as well as pectin lyase (AK335586) and hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (DR737925) that are involved in cell walls maintenance and synthesis, were observed to be up-regulated. In contrast, the cellulose synthesis-related gene cellulose synthase-like H1 (AK332242), pectin lyase (AK335102), and hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (AK072978*, rice GenBank accession), which are involved in cell wall synthesis and maintenance, were observed to be down-regulated (Table 2).

Several genes in wheat were also differentially expressed under the cyst pathogen stresses. Among these alterations, the gene (JV948284) similar to the Arabidopsis gene, which encodes proline-rich extensin, peroxidase (EF028783, JW017812), and monocopper oxidase (JP837828) and performs a [hypothetical] role in the general defense response of plants, was up-regulated. In contrast, two genes, including the pathogenesis-related protein gene (JP233598) and thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidase (AF532972), were down-regulated (Table 2). However, a few other defense-response genes were observed, usually 2–8 days after the SCN invasion, and were absent during the 24 h after challenge with H. filipjevi.

Three genes encoding the NBS-LRR disease-resistance proteins (GAJL01182435, CJ848889, and CV767657), the rust-resistance protein gene (JP940665), and the mildew-resistance gene (MLO5, GAJL01189557) were up-regulated. Notably, the gene encoding a protein similar to the resistance protein candidate (CV767657) was up-regulated, exhibiting an increase of greater than 10.0 folds and an FC ratio of 15.3837, while the other two genes corresponding to the NBS-LRR disease-resistance proteins (DP000010*, rice GenBank accession; AK336044) were down-regulated (Table 2).

Transcription factors and signal transduction-related genes: The wheat genome is known to contain at least 1,127 predicted transcription factors (TFs), which have been classified into 57 families (Wheat Transcription Factor database-PlantTFDB; http://planttfdb_v1.cbi.pku.edu.cn:9010/web/index.php?sp=ta). In the present study, 43 differentially expressed TFs were identified, which belonged to approximately 18 families, namely, ABI3-VP1, AP2-EREBP, ARF, ARID, bZIP, C2H2, C3HC4, CCAAT, FHA, HB, HLH, HMG, MYB, NAC, TCP, TLP, trihelix, and WRKY. Among these differentially expressed TFs, most of the members of the WRKY, MYB, and AP2-EREBP families were up-regulated, while the members of C2H2, C3HC4, HB, and TLP families were either up-regulated or down-regulated.

Forty-eight signaling-related genes were identified as infection responsive genes, 32 of which were up-regulated. Twenty-one of the signaling-related genes were identified as protein kinase genes based on the query against the database of rice kinase (http://phylomics.ucdavis.edu/kinase/). All the protein kinases in the database are divided into the following seven groups: AGC kinases, CaM kinases, CK1, CMGC, STE, TKL, and the non-classified. Among the differentially-expressed protein kinase genes, ten genes belonging to the TKL family were up-regulated, while one gene from the uridine kinase family was up-regulated remarkably with an FC ratio of 11.8762. Three genes from the CMGC family and one gene from the CK1 family were down-regulated.

The expressions of several other genes relevant to cell signaling and communication were altered as well. Two genes associated with synaptic signaling (GAEF01091554 and GAJL01128233), two ras-related protein genes (CD877975 and GAJL01223381), two signal-transducing G protein genes (JW026210 and BT008975), three calcium-related genes (JV954788, HE996494, and JV998694), the protein phosphatase 2C gene (GAJL01007051), and one cyclin-like F-box domain-containing protein gene (AK332287) were up-regulated. The GTPase-activating protein gene (AK332208) and the remorin protein gene (AK330902) were down-regulated (Table 3).

 

 

Fig. 4: Functional classification of the 317 annotated genes out of 820 significantly regulated genes in H. filipjevi -infected wheat roots.

A, The bar chart representation of Gene Ontology (GO) classification of the 317 annotated genes. It includes three main categories: biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. The y-axis on the left indicates the number of up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in a category, respectively. The y-axis on the right indicates the percent of a specific category of up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes in that main category, respectively. B, Functional distribution of the 317 annotated genes in different tentative functional categories. Of the 317 annotated genes, 14% are unclassified for function unknown. C, The bar chart representation of the 317 annotated genes in different tentative functional categories. The y-axis indicates the number of up-regulated and down-regulated annotated genes.

 

 The genes encoding nine different secondary transporters (CJ628086; C99253*, rice GenBank accession; JW033866; AP008217*, rice GenBank accession; AB539586; JP210959; JW014975; CA486682; AK331727), as well as the five ATP-dependent transporter genes (JV979550; BT008921; AK332850; JV980384; AK066618*, rice GenBank accession) were down-regulated, while three genes associated with multidrug resistance (AK332498; GAJL01218900; AP008212*, rice GenBank accession) were up-regulated (Table 3).

Genes involved in metabolism: Metabolic enzymes are classified into six groups: oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases, and ligases. A total of 55 genes encoding metabolic enzymes were identified as being differentially expressed, among which 30 genes were up-regulated, including the 14 genes associated with protein and amino acid metabolism and the 14 hydrolase encoding genes. Genes encoding Glucan endo–1,3-β-glucosidase (JP861804), NADP-dependent malic enzyme (JP845417), galactose oxidase (AK100645*, rice GenBank accession; GAEF01030908), and 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase acyltransferase domain-containing protein Table 2: The selected genes from the 317 annotated genes that involved are involved in cell structure, defense, and transcription factor in wheat roots at 24 hpi after H. filipjevi inoculation. GenBank accession with “*”is rice gene accession

 

Functional category

GenBank accession

Fold change

Description

Cell structure

 

 

 

Up-regulated

DR737925

7.237

Similar to Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein DZ-HRGP precursor

 

AK335586

2.7477

Pectin lyase fold family protein

 

JV945131

2.0119

Probable glucuronosyltransferase involved in the synthesis of glucuronoxylan hemicellulose in secondary cell walls

 

JV987084

2.0098

Cellulase, glycosyl hydrolase family 5

Down-regulated

AK072978*

0.4707

Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein

 

AK335102

0.3277

Pectin lyase fold family protein

 

AK332242

0.2467

Cellulose synthase-like H1

Stress/defense related

 

 

 

Up-regulated

CV767657

15.3837

Similar to NBS-LRR Resistance protein candidate

 

GAJL01189557

7.4513

Mildew resistance gene, MLO5

 

JP940665

4.319

Rust resistance protein

 

JW017812

3.4493

Similar to Peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7),

 

JP837828

2.5819

Monocopper oxidase

 

CJ848889

2.2945

NBS-LRR type resistance protein

 

JV948284

2.1583

Proline-rich extensin-like family protein

 

EF028783

2.0491

Similar to Peroxidase precursor (EC 1.11.1.7)

 

GAJL01182435

2.0401

NBS-LRR disease resistance protein

Down-regulated

JP852719

0.4913

Similar to Thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.11)

 

JP233598

0.4531

Similar to Steroid membrane binding protein-like, OsFBT7-F-box and tubby domain-containing protein

 

AK336044

0.4076

Similar to NBS-LRR disease resistance protein homolog

 

DP000010*

0.328

Similar to NBS-LRR type resistance protein

Transcription factor

 

 

 

Up-regulated

JF951950

84.2977

MYB-like DNA-binding domain containing protein

 

GAJL01041979

42.8642

Similar to AP2 domain containing protein RAP2

 

EU665453

5.2611

Similar to WRKY transcription factor 59

 

GAEF01013195

4.8624

WRKY transcription factor 74

 

JV951032

4.8347

MYB DNA-binding domain containing protein

 

JP923124

3.2649

Ethylene-responsive factor,AP2

Down-regulated

GAEF01037412

0.4614

Homeobox protein knotted-1–1, HB

 

JP848030

0.4278

OsFBT7 – F-box and tubby domain containing protein, TLP

 

HP633405

0.3291

Zinc finger, C3HC4 type, domain containing protein

 

AK335450

0.2873

Zinc knuckle domain containing protein, C2H2

 

 

(BJ270556) were up-regulated, while seven sugar-related genes were down-regulated (Table 3). Six of the identified genes were involved in lipase metabolism, among which four genes encoding fatty acid desaturase (JW031840), thioesterase (AP003572*, rice GenBank accession), hydrolase (JP844213), and lipase family protein (CA635498) were down-regulated. In contrast, those encoding lipase-related protein (BJ222289) and esterase/lipase/thioesterase domain-containing protein (JP901515) were upregulated (Table 3). With the only exception of cytochrome P450 (CK206961), most of the genes associated with drug metabolism were up-regulated at 24 hpi. Most of the genes encoding chloroplast-related enzymes were up-regulated, while those encoding photosystem I subunit L (JP832184) and porphobilinogen deaminase (AK333284) were down-regulated (Table 3). Taken together, these results indicated that when comparing the genes associated with catabolism and those associated with anabolism, the number of up-regulated genes was higher [by a small number] in the former group. This possibly reflected the situation around the establishment of the feeding site.

Real-time qRT-PCR to verify microarray data: In order to verify the microarray data and study the dynamic changes occurring in the gene expression, the expression profiles of the six genes that were altered dramatically (five up-regulated and one down-regulated) were analyzed using real-time qRT-PCR (Fig. 5). The results demonstrated that cell wall-associated kinase 4 (WAK4), NADP-dependent malic enzyme (NADP-ME), ethylene-responsive factor-like transcription factor ERFL 2b, WRKY 80, and WRKY 10 were significantly up-regulated after the H. filipjevi infection, which was consistent with the microarray data. Nevertheless, certain exceptions were observed. The expression of the WRKY 72-b gene in the real-time qRT-PCR analysis was less than that in the microarray data. However, in general, the data from real-time qRT-PCR confirmed the expression trend of the corresponding genes observed from the microarray analysis.

 

Discussion

 

Infection in host plants with the cyst nematode is a complicated process, which could be generally divided into several distinct stages. Although two dpi or three dpi are often selected for observing the development of syncytium, the previously proposed time point for the initial establishment of the feeding cell was 18 hpi (Sobczak and Golinowski 2009). In the present study, 24 hpi was selected as an important time point for the screening of early responses of wheat to CCN infections. Traditional techniques for evaluating gene expression could detect a limited number of genes. With the employment of a recently-developed microarray to analyze the alterations in gene transcription in susceptible wheat roots at 24 hpi, the present study became a pioneer in demonstrating the differentially expression of genes in wheat after the CCN infection using a whole-genome microarray. This analysis generated huge data that provided indications regarding the expressions of a large number of wheat genes during the critical period of infection when the CCN began to establish feeding sites. This data also revealed the commonality and uniqueness in the gene expression profiles between the compatible wheat–CCN interaction and soybean–SCN interaction at similar time-points (Puthoff et al. 2003; Khan et al. 2004).

 A few studies investigated the alterations in gene expression after infection with SCN in both susceptible and resistant soybean cultivars, during an extended period of six hpi to eight dpi (Alkharouf et al. 2006). These studies demonstrated that the gene expression patterns of soybean varied remarkably with progress in nematode infection. Remarkably down-regulated gene expression was observed at 24 hpi in the susceptible soybean infected with SCN. Similar to the above-stated finding, the present study also revealed that the number of up-regulated and down-regulated genes in susceptible wheat at 24 hpi accounted for 60 and 40% of the total differentially-expressed genes, respectively, thereby exhibiting a unique gene expression profile. The present study also suggested that the down-regulation of genes upon CCN infection might be as important as the up-regulation of genes for the successful establishment of the feeding site and the subsequent successful parasitism.

 

Table 3: The selected genes from the 317 annotated genes that are involved in signal transduction, transport, and metabolism in wheat roots at 24 hpi after H. filipjevi inoculation. GenBank accession with “*”is rice gene accession

 

Functional category

GenBank accession

Fold change

Description

Signal transduction

 

 

 

Up-regulated

CD877975

134.1545

Ras-related protein

 

AK332287

7.3067

Cyclin-like F-box domain containing protein

 

JV998694

4.9537

calcium ion binding

 

BT008975

4.2439

signal-transducing G protein

 

JV954788

2.7883

Calreticulin family protein

 

HE996494

2.5925

IQ calmodulin-binding region domain containing protein

 

GAJL01128233

2.5116

synaptic transmission

 

JW026210

2.5073

signal-transducing G protein

 

GAJL01007051

2.4449

Similar to Protein phosphatase 2C-like

 

GAJL01223381

2.2173

Ras-related protein

 

GAEF01091554

2.1911

synaptotagmin

Down-regulated

AK332208

0.4977

GTPase-activating protein

 

AK330902

0.3848

Remorin protein

Transport

 

 

 

Up-regulated

AK332498

75.3024

Multidrug resistance protein

 

AP008212*

3.696

Similar to multidrug resistance associated protein 1

 

GAJL01218900

3.2219

Multidrug resistance protein

Down-regulated

AK066618*

0.4859

F-ATPase

 

CA486682

0.446

Secondary transporter

 

JW014975

0.4427

Secondary transporter

 

AK331727

0.4408

Secondary transporter

 

JP210959

0.4036

Secondary transporter

 

AB539586

0.3931

Secondary Transporter

 

AP008217*

0.3845

Secondary transporter

 

JV980384

0.3718

P-ATPase

 

AK332850

0.3347

ATP-Dependent ABCB, ABC, ABCB

 

BT008921

0.3235

ATP-Dependent ABCB, ABC, ABCC

 

JV979550

0.2769

ATP-Dependent ABCB, ABC, ABCB

 

JW033866

0.2622

Secondary transporter

 

C99253*

0.2473

Secondary transporter

 

CJ628086

0.2135

Secondary transporter

Metabolism

 

 

 

Up-regulated

AK100645*

7.325

Galactose oxidase

 

 

BJ270556

6.8057

2-oxo acid dehydrogenases acyltransferase domain containing protein

 

BJ222289

4.1343

Lipase-related

 

GAEF01030908

2.8625

Galactose oxidase

 

JP845417

2.4679

NADP-dependent malic enzyme

 

JP901515

2.4033

Esterase/lipase/thioesterase domain containing protein

 

JP861804

2.3658

Glucan endo–1,3-beta-glucosidase precursor

Down-regulated

CK206961

0.4998

Similar to Cytochrome P450 76C2 (EC 1.14.-.-)

 

CA635498

0.4956

Lipase class 3 family protein

 

JP844213

0.4392

hydrolysis

 

JP832184

0.4075

PSAL (photosystem I subunit L)

 

AP003572*

0.3598

Thioesterase family protein

 

JW031840

0.3454

Fatty acid acyl-CoA desaturase family protein

 

AK333284

0.2012

Similar to Porphobilinogen deaminase

 

 

 

Fig. 5: Quantitative Real-Time PCR verification of the six differential genes expression level. Transcript levels were presented as relative values that were normalized with respect to the level of wheat actin gene

 

 The present study revealed an up-regulation of two peroxidase precursors (EF028783 and JW017812) and one monocopper oxidase (JP837828), and the down-regulation of thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidase (JP852719) and a protein similar to peroxidase I (JP233598). It is known that among the numerous defense-related proteins, class III peroxidase (Prx, EC 1.11.1.7) is involved in auxin metabolism, cell wall elongation, and stiffening, and the protection of plants against abiotic and biotic stresses (Kawano 2003; Cosio and Dunand 2009). Several studies have demonstrated that peroxidase is involved in the defense response of H. avenae (Al-Doss et al. 2010; Simonetti et al. 2012). Seven groups of peroxides have been identified in wheat, three of which were induced in both susceptible and resistant lines at four dpi and seven dpi, respectively, in a previous study (Simonetti et al. 2012). In addition, ascorbate peroxidases (APX, EC 1.11.1.11), which are class I peroxidase members, were demonstrated to be induced in similar and higher magnitudes in the anti-infection genotypes and the susceptible genotypes, respectively (Simonetti et al. 2010). Monocopper oxidases are also supposed to participate in cell wall expansion. Plants defend against nematodes by using various mechanisms, such as the pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, production of phyto-alexins and hypersensitive response (H), lignification, oxidative burst, and reinforcement of cell wall (Almagro et al. 2009). When plants are under biotic or abiotic stress, the expression of defense response-related genes is altered significantly after signal burst (Whitham et al. 2006; Użarowska et al. 2009). The findings of the present study confirmed that peroxidases and monocopper oxidases were important pathogenesis-related proteins (Almagro et al. 2009).

Besides Prxs and cellulose (AK332242), one wheat gene (JP233598), which is similar to the pathogenesis-related protein gene in Arabidopsis, was down-regulated. The expression of genes encoding SAM22, Kunitz trypsin inhibitor, germin-like protein, chitinases, and lipoxygenase, which have been previously demonstrated to often respond dramatically in susceptible soybean (Alkharouf et al. 2006), was not identified in susceptible wheat. Surprisingly, several genes related to defense proteins were observed to be dramatically regulated by the CCN infection, such as those related to the NBS-LRR proteins (DP000010*, rice GenBank accession; AK336044; GAJL01182435; CJ848889; CV767657) and the genes encoding proteins involved in plant resistance (Alkharouf et al. 2006; Klink and Matthews 2009). The contrary finding in the present study indicates the importance of down-regulation of resistance genes in susceptible hosts during the formation of the functional syncytium.

The present study revealed that wheat genes encoding proteins similar to Arabidopsis thaliana proline-rich extension (JV948284), hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (DR737925), glycosyl hydrolase family 5 (JV987084), and pectinesterase (AK335586) were up-regulated, which was consistent with the previous findings in susceptible soybean at a similar time point, although the gene encoding expansin was not altered at 24 hpi. The results demonstrated that most cell wall-related genes were influenced by the different infection patterns of nematodes, which was not completely consistent with the previous studies on the induction patterns of cell wall structural proteins, mainly extensins, in tobacco (Niebel et al. 1993) and soybean (Khan et al. 2004) in an interaction compatible with cyst nematode. Moreover, several cell wall-related genes such as cellulose synthase-like H1 (AK332242), pectin lyase fold family protein (AK335102), and hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (AK072978*, rice GenBank accession) were down-regulated, indicating that the down-regulation of these genes probably plays a major role in the establishment of feeding site of nematodes. The migration and establishment of feeding site often induce degradation of cell walls, triggering a series of alterations in cell wall-related genes. Extensive changes in cell wall structure are the markers for syncytial development (Ithal et al. 2007b). Recently, several molecular studies have demonstrated that the genes encoding cell wall modifying proteins, including reversible glycosylated polypeptides, different kinds of glycosyltransferases, xylose glucan endotransferases, β-1,4-endoglucanases, α-expansion, and repeated proline-rich proteins, are differentially expressed in response to soybean cyst nematode (Ithal et al. 2007a; Mazarei et al. 2011). In particular, xyloglucan endotransglycosylases were observed to be expressed specifically within the cyst nematode-induced feeding cells (Ithal et al. 2007b). In soybean–SCN compatible interaction, the genes encoding repetitive proline-rich protein extensin, cellulose, and expansin, were observed to be up-regulated upon SCN infection (Ithal et al. 2007a; Klink et al. 2007b). These structural proteins might have a role in strengthening the syncytium walls to protect the nutrient contents during a compatible cyst nematode interaction (Khan et al. 2004; Alkharouf et al. 2006).

In the present study, most of the signal transduction-related genes (32/48) were regulated after CCN infection. TFs belonging to WRKY, MYB, and AP2-EREBP families were up-regulated, which was consistent with the finding of a previous study on soybean that TFs from the WRKY family were persistently up-regulated in susceptible soybean from six hpi to eight dpi (Alkharouf et al. 2006).

In the present study, genes for fifty-five metabolic enzymes were identified as differentially expressed genes, among which 30 genes were up-regulated. Seven sugar-related genes were down-regulated in susceptible wheat at 24 hpi; this was inconsistent with the previously reported observations in susceptible soybean at six dpi and eight dpi, according to which, several sugar-related genes were up-regulated (Alkharouf et al. 2006). The findings indicating the involvement of certain identified genes in lipase metabolism was contrary to the previous findings in soybean (Alkharouf et al. 2006; Klink et al. 2007a, b). A few up-regulated genes were identified to be associated with catabolism, which was contrary to previous findings in soybean (Klink et al. 2007a, b); this might be related to the establishment of the feeding site.

Furthermore, transporter-related genes were identified in the present study, with the genes encoding ATP-dependent transporters and secondary transporters being down-regulated and the genes encoding multidrug resistance protein being strongly up-regulated. These findings could reflect the dramatic pathological changes associated with the formation of syncytium.

In the present study, 1.1% of the identified genes were up-regulated genes, and 0.7% were down-regulated genes, similar to the previously reported ratios for the whole root sample of soybean (1.0 and 0.6%, respectively) (Alkharouf et al. 2006). However, the complexity of the wheat–CCN interactions suggested more gene expressions are involved in the process of compatible infection.

 

Conclusion

 

In conclusion, the results of the present study, first of all, unraveled the gene expression profiles in the susceptible wheat after the CCN infection. A total of 820 transcripts were functionally annotated. With the inclusion of samples from CCN-infected wheat roots, the results obtained in the present study revealed important information regarding the gene expression associated with the wheat response to the infection, in terms of defense, cell structure, and signal transduction. Accordingly, a number of transcripts and their functional annotations provided information that would allow exploring the molecular mechanism underlying CCN resistance in Tritium aestivum L. Furthermore, certain genes were identified to be dramatically altered in the CCN-infected wheat, which indicated that further investigation is required to understand the molecular mechanism occurring in CCN-infected wheat.

 

Acknowledgments

 

The financial supports for this work were provided by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0201700). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

 

Author Contributions

 

X.X. conceived and designed the research; X.X., H.Y. and Y.G. performed the experiments. The manuscript was written by X.X. with input and corrections from all coauthors.

 

References

 

Al-Doss AA, AS Al-Hazmi, AA Dawabah, AA Abdel-Mawgood, SM Al-Rehiayani, S Al-Otayk, KA Moustafa, M Motawei (2010). Impact of Cre and peroxidase genes of selected new wheat lines on cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae Woll) resistance. Aust J Crop Sci 4:737–743

Alkharouf NW, VP Klink, IB Chouikha, H Beard, MH MacDonald, S Meyer, HT Knap, R Khan, BF Matthews (2006). Timecourse microarray analyses reveal global changes in gene expression of susceptible Glycine max (soybean) roots during infection by Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode). Planta 224:838852

Almagro L, LG Ros, S Belchi-Navarro, R Bru, AR Barceló, M Pedreño (2009). Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. J Exp Bot 60:377‒390

Anderberg MR (1973). Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press, New York, USA

Bybd JDW, T Kirkpatrick, KR Barker (1983). An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. J Nematol 15:142–143

Canales RD, Y Luo, JC Willey, B Austermiller, CC Barbacioru, C Boysen, K Hunkapiller, RV Jensen, CR Knight, KY Lee (2006). Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms. Nat Biotechnol 24:11151122

Chen PS, MZ Wang, DL Peng (1991). Preliminary report of identification on cereal cyst nematode of wheat in China. Sci Agric Sin 24:8991

Cosio C, C Dunand (2009). Specific functions of individual class III peroxidase genes. J Exp Bot 60:391408

Davis EL, RS Hussey, MG Mitchum, TJ Baum (2008). Parasitism proteins in nematode–plant interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:360366

Gheysen G, MG Mitchum (2009). Molecular insights in the susceptible plant response to nematode infection. In: Cell Biology of Plant Nematode Parasitism, pp:45‒81. Berg HR (Ed.). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany

Ithal N, J Recknor, D Nettleton, L Hearne, T Maier, TJ Baum, MG Mitchum (2007a). Parallel genome-wide expression profiling of host and pathogen during soybean cyst nematode infection of soybean. Mol Plant Microb Interact 20:293305

Ithal N, J Recknor, D Nettleton, T Maier, TJ Baum, MG Mitchum (2007b). Developmental transcript profiling of cyst nematode feeding cells in soybean roots. Mol Plant Microb Interact 20:510525

Jung C, U Wyss (1999). New approaches to control plant parasitic nematodes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:439446

Kawano T (2003). Roles of the reactive oxygen species-generating peroxidase reactions in plant defense and growth induction. Plant Cell Rep 21:829837

Khan R, N Alkharouf, H Beard, M Macdonald, I Chouikha, S Meyer, J Grefenstette, H Knap, B Matthews (2004). Microarray analysis of gene expression in soybean roots susceptible to the soybean cyst nematode two days post invasion. J Nematol 36:241248

Klink VP, BF Matthews (2009). Emerging approaches to broaden resistance of soybean to soybean cyst nematode as supported by gene expression studies. Plant Physiol 151:10171022

Klink VP, CC Overall, NW Alkharouf, MH MacDonald, BF Matthews (2007a). Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and comparative microarray expression analysis of syncytial cells isolated from incompatible and compatible soybean (Glycine max) roots infected by the soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Planta 226:13891409

Klink VP, CC Overall, NW Alkharouf, MH MacDonald, BF Matthews (2007b). A time-course comparative microarray analysis of an incompatible and compatible response by Glycine max (soybean) to Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode) infection. Planta 226:14231447

Li HL, HX Yuan, JW Sun, B Fu, GL Nian, XS Hou, XP Xing, BJ Sun (2010). First record of the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi in China. Plant Dis 94:1505–1508

Mahalingam R, HT Skorupska (1996). Cytological expression of early response to infection by Heterodera glycines Ichinohe in resistant PI 437654 soybean. Genome 39:986998

Mazarei M, W Liu, H Al-Ahmad, PR Arelli, VR Pantalone, CN Stewart (2011). Gene expression profiling of resistant and susceptible soybean lines infected with soybean cyst nematode. Theor Appl Genet 123:11931206

Niebel A, JDA Engler, C Tire, G Engler, MV Montagu, G Gheysen (1993). Induction patterns of an extensin gene in tobacco upon nematode infection. Plant Cell 5:16971710

Peng DL, WK Huang, JH Sun, CJ Liu, HM Zhang (2012). First report of cereal cyst nematode (Heterodera avenae) in Tianjing, China. In: Nematology Research in China, pp:162163. Liao J (Ed.). China Agric Sci Tech Press, Beijing, China

Puthoff DP, D Nettleton, SR Rodermel, TJ Baum (2003). Arabidopsis gene expression changes during cyst nematode parasitism revealed by statistical analyses of microarray expression profiles. Plant J 33:911921

Quackenbush J (2002). Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32:496‒501

Simonetti E, E Alba, A Delibes (2012). Chromosomal location of four genes encoding Class III peroxidases in wheat. Phyton 81:139142

Simonetti E, E Alba, MJ Montes, Á Delibes, I López-Braña (2010). Analysis of ascorbate peroxidase genes expressed in resistant and susceptible wheat lines infected by the cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae. Plant Cell Rep 29:11691178

Smiley RW, JM Nicol (2009). Nematodes which challenge global wheat production. In: Wheat Science and Trade, pp:171187. Brett F (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York, USA

Sobczak M, W Golinowski (2009). Structure of cyst nematode feeding sites. In: Cell Biology of Plant Nematode Parasitism, pp:153187. Berg HR (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany

Tusher VG, R Tibshirani, G Chu (2001). Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:51165121

Użarowska A, G Dionisio, B Sarholz, H Piepho, M Xu, CR Ingvardsen, G Wenzel, T Lübberstedt (2009). Validation of candidate genes putatively associated with resistance to SCMV and MDMV in maize (Zea mays L.) by expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol 9; Article 15

Whitham TG, JK Bailey, JA Schweitzer, SM Shuster, RK Bangert, CJ LeRoy, EV Lonsdorf, GJ Allan, SP DiFazio, BM Potts (2006). A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: From genes to ecosystems. Nat Rev Genet 7:510523

Williamson VM, A Kumar (2006). Nematode resistance in plants: The battle underground. Trends Genet 22:396403

Zhang JJ, HX Yuan, RQ Zhang, XP Xing, JL Dai, JS Niu, HL Li, PD Chen (2012). Analysis of resistance to Heterodera filipjevi in Triticum aestivum- dasypyrum villosum germplasm. Acta Agron Sin 38:19691976